Mouse taste preferences: Influence of age, sex, and diet

 

To examine whether age influences taste solution preferences we measured intakes of C57BL/6J and 129X1/SvJ mice given a series of 48-h two-bottle tests with a choice between water and one of the following seven taste solutions: 2 mM saccharin, 5 mM citric acid, 30 µM quinine hydrochloride, 75 mM sodium chloride (NaCl), 10 mM inosine monophosphate (IMP), 50 mM calcium chloride (CaCl2), and 10% ethanol.  We tested separate groups of male mice fed Teklad 8604 chow at ages 4, 6, 9, 12, 15, 20, 25, 30, 40, and 50 wk, and retested some of these mice at 54, 75, 100, and 125 wk.  Additional groups of female mice fed chow were tested at ages 4, 8, 12, 25, 50, 54, 75, 100 and 125 wk, and male mice fed a semisynthetic diet (AIN-93G) were tested at ages 4, 12, 25, 50, 54, 75, and 100 wk.  Concentration-response functions for each taste solution were collected from male and female mice fed chow and aged 8 or 125 wk.  In general, the results showed that age had little effect on taste preferences.  Exceptions included (1) a gradual but progressive reduction in IMP preference between 4 – 125 wk in male and female 129 mice, (2) a marked reduction in CaCl2 preference between 54 – 125 wk in male and female 129 mice, (3) a marked increase in NaCl preference between 4 - 12 wk in female but not male B6 mice, and (4) a marked reduction in ethanol preference between 4 - 12 wk in male B6 mice fed AIN-76A diet but not chow.  These results show that over a wide range and with the exceptions noted, age contributes little to the variation in taste preferences observed in C57BL/6J and 129X1/SvJ mice.

 

(Paper submitted to Chemical Senses, Dec 18th 2006; contact the PI for a preprint)

 

Schematic of the design

There were ~16 B6 and ~16 129 mice tested at each age listed with an x in the table below.

 

Age at start of tests

Part

of
 Experiment

Males

 fed Teklad 8604 chow

Females fed Teklad 8604 chow

Males fed AIN-96G diet

4

1

x

x

x

6

1

x

 

 

8

3

x

x

 

9

1

x

 

 

12

1

x

x

x

15

1

x

 

 

20

1

x

 

 

25

1

x

x

x

30

1

x

 

 

40

1

x

 

 

50

1

x

x

x

54

2

x

x

x

75

2

x

x

x

100

2

x

x

x

125

3

x

x

 

  x = mice of this age and sex were tested

 

The experiment involved four large series of analyses, which are provided, along with raw data, in the following Excel 2003 files.

 

1.  B6 and 129 males fed chow at 4, 6, 9, 12, 15, 20, 25, 30, 40, 50, 54, 75, 100, and 125 wk

 

2.  B6 and 129 males fed chow and females fed chow at 4, 8, 12, 25, 50, 54, 75, 100 and 125 wk

 

3.  B6 and 129 males fed chow with males fed AIN-93G diet at 4, 12, 25, 50, 54, 75, and 100 wk

 

4.  Concentration-response functions of B6 and 129 males and females fed chow at 8 and 125 wk

 

 

 

The following describes the methods and results of Part I of the experiment (naïve mice tested at ages between 4 and 50 wk):

 

Groups of  ~16 mice were tested.  All were shipped from the vendor, Jackson Laboratories, at the age of 3 wk, and then individually housed until the appropriate age for testing.  The main experiment involved groups of male B6 and 129 mice fed chow.  There were cohorts at 4, 6, 9, 12, 15, 20, 25, 30, 40, and 50 wk old.  Smaller experiments examined the effect of sex and age.  The male mice fed chow at 4, 12, 25, and 50 wk were compared with female mice fed chow and male mice fed AIN93G diet (since 3 wk old) of the same age.

 

The mice were tested simultaneously, in two replications of ~288 mice, conducted one day apart.  They received 48-hr two-bottle choice tests of the solutions listed below, in the order given.

 

Note: All values are intakes during a 48 h test.

 

Comparison of males fed chow at 4, 6, 9, 12, 15, 20, 25, 30, 40, and 50 wk

Comparison of male and females at 4, 12, 25 and 50 wk

Comparison of males fed chow with males fed AIN93G diet at 4, 12, 25 and 50 wk

 

Water intake

2 mM Saccharin intake

5 mM Citric acid intake

0.03 mM QHCl intake

75 mM NaCl intake

10 mM IMP

75 mM CaCl2 intake

10% ETOH intake

 

Back to top