Tordoff,
M.G., and Bachmanov, A.A. Mouse taste
preference tests: Why only two bottles? Chemical
Senses, 28: 315-324, 2003.
Two-bottle
tests have been used extensively to measure the preference for taste and
nutrient solutions but there has been little work with tests involving more
than two bottles. Here, we compare the
results obtained in two-bottle tests with those obtained in three- and
six-bottle tests. In Experiment 1, we measured the preferences for 2 mM
saccharin, 50 mM citric acid, 0.3 mM quinine hydrochloride and 75 mM NaCl displayed
by 129X1/SvJ (129) and C57BL/6J (B6) mice.
When mice received three bottles, two providing a taste solution and one providing water, they drank more of the taste solution
than when they received a standard two-bottle test, or two spouts providing water
and one providing taste solution. The
three-bottle tests also revealed the left spout side preferences of the 129
strain and were generally better at distinguishing between the 129 and B6
strains (i.e., were more sensitive) than were two-bottle tests. In Experiment
2, we measured intakes and preferences in tests with 6 bottles, with 1, 2,
3, 4, or 5 containing 75 mM NaCl and the rest containing water. NaCl preferences were monotonically related
to the number of NaCl spouts available.
A follow-up experiment found similar results whether the index of
ingestion was volume intakes or licks.
This argues that spillage cannot account for the effect of spout number
on taste solution intake. Together, the
results suggest that (a) the number of bottles of taste solution and water has
a profound influence on taste solution intake and preference, and (b)
three-bottle tests may be more sensitive than two-bottle tests in many
circumstances.
The work in this paper led us to expand our investigations to examine other situations involving access to multiple sources of nutrients. Two papers are completed:
Tordoff,
M.G. Obesity by choice: The powerful
effect of nutrient availability on nutrient intake. American
Journal of Physiology, 282: R1536-R1539, 2002.
The consumption of
nutrients by rodents is markedly influenced by the number of containers of each
nutrient provided. Most rats given a choice from separate sources of protein,
carbohydrate, and fat thrived if given one cup of each but half failed to
thrive if given one cup of each and three extra cups of carbohydrate or fat.
Rats given five bottles of sucrose solution and one bottle of water became
fatter than rats given five bottles of water and one of sucrose. These studies
in rats may point to a model for human obesity, in which the availability of
food can override physiological controls of ingestion.
Tordoff, M.G.
and Bachmanov, A.A. Influence of the
Number Of Alcohol and Water Bottles on Murine Alcohol
Intake. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 27, 600-606, 2003.
Background: Most work to understand the controls of
alcohol intake by animals involves the “two-bottle choice” method in which a
choice is given between a bottle of alcohol and a bottle of water. Recent experiments involving other nutrients
suggest that intakes are profoundly influenced by the number of nutrient
choices available. Here, we extended
these observations by measuring the alcohol consumption of mice and rats given
multiple choices of water and alcohol.
Results: In all experiments, the volume of alcohol
consumed was strongly and positively related to the number of alcohol bottles available
and inversely related to the number of water bottles available. The effect of alcohol availability on alcohol
intake persisted for at least 24 days.
Conclusions: Alcohol intake is strongly influenced by
availability. The results point to a simple
method of manipulating murine alcohol intake over a wide range. They provide an animal model that might be
useful for understanding the influence of alcohol availability on human alcohol
consumption.